Jack Benny Pleads Guilty To Smuggling

Did you know that in 1939, Jack Benny was indited for smuggling $2131 worth of jewelry? I found this article fascinating:

Radio Comedian Given Suspended Sentence, Fined $10,000
By United Press
NEW YORK, April 4—Jack Benny, $12,000-a-week radio comedian, pleaded guilty in federal court to an indictment charging that he smuggled $2131 worth of jewelry in conspiracy with Albert N. Chaperau, confessed master smuggler.
Benny received a suspended sentence of one year and a day in prison and a fine of $10,000.
Benny stood in federal courtroom while U. S. District Judge Vincent L. Leibell passed the sentence and chided him for his admitted illegal activities.
“You must feel very much ashamed of yourself standing here, Mr. Benny,” the judge said.
Benny turned a deep red. He muttered an almost inaudible:
“I do.”
A few minutes before sentence was passed, Benny, who flew here from Hollywood last night, had changed an earlier plea of “not guilty,” on the advice of his attorney and in the face of reports that the Government planned to prosecute his case vigorously.
Benny was indicted on Jan. 10 on charges that he conspired with Chaperau, confessed master smuggler, to bring in the jewels for the comedian’s partner-wife, Mary Livingstone.
Burns Also Fined
George Burns, of the radio comic team of Burns and Allen, pleaded guilty to smuggling in another case involving Chaperau. Burns received the same suspended sentence as did Benny, but his fines and penatlies totaled $17,700.
In smuggling the gems Benny avoided the payment of duty estimated at not more than $700, it was charged.
By seeking to avoid payment of a $700 duty, Benny made himself liable to civil penalties equal to the domestic value of the jewelry, which, according to federal appraisers, was $2131.
If he wishes to regain custody of the trinkets he must pay the Government an additional $2131. He had indicated, however, when he turned the jewels over to the Government last Jan. 10 that he would not attempt to get them back.
“I never want, to see the things again,” he said.
Benny heard U. S. Attorney John T. Cahill detail the events which led to the filing of the smuggling charge. Then, nervously shifting his weight from one foot to another he listened to as severe a denunciation of “human gullibility” as was ever heard in New York Federal Court.
Suggests Guardian
Judge Leibell said he believed that Benny had been victimized by his co-defendant, Chaperau. After suggesting the appointment of “guardians for persons of prominence who are easy prey for this type of man,” Judge Leibell asked to see a copy of the three-count indictment. While he studied the document, tension in the courtroom mounted and Benny alternately blanched and blushed.
Leibell pronounced sentence count by count. On the first he fined Benny $5000 and ordered him committed until the fine is paid,” and sentenced him to one year and one day in prison, adding “execution of sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation.”
Explains Sentence
He fined Benny $2500 each on the second and third counts and then explained:
“Mr. Benny, that means you must pay a fine of $10,000 and that you have been sentenced to prison but that the sentence is suspended.”
He gave Benny until 4 p. m. today to pay the fine. The comedian’s attorney indicated he would do so before leaving by airplane for Hollywood tonight.
The indictment charged that Benny smuggled, transported, and concealed two diamond-studded gold clips and one diamond-studded bracelet in order to cheat the Government out of less than $800 in duty.
As described by Cahill, the crime took place in the summer or fall of 1937. Benny and his wife, Mary Livingstone, went to France. In Paris Benny bought the jewelry at a total cost of $1462 in American money. They then went to Cannes where they met Chaperau. The smuggler took charge of the jewelry there and returned with it to the United States, entering under a non-resident passport and telling customs officials that the trinkets belonged to him.
Chaperau, who will be sentenced on April 11, delivered the jewelry to Benny in California through George Burns, Cahill said.
Carl Newton, Benny’s New York attorney, told Judge Leibell that the smuggling idea was conceived by Chaperau, whom Benny had met in Hollywood.
Say U. S. Let Down
“He just wanted to do Mr. Benny a favor, I suppose,” Leibell remarked, adding that Benny “should have been smart enough not to have fallen in with a plan of that kind.”
“He should have been big enough,” the judge said, “not to fall in with any plan to deprive his Government of a paltry $700. By doing what he did he was letting his country down. If I thought he really planned it I’d take a different view. Apparently we need a guardian for a good many of these people who become prominent and wealthy.”
Newton had said that Chaperau approached Benny in the railroad platform as the actor was leaving Cannes and proposed the smuggling scheme.
End of the Play
“I suppose it didn’ t occur to you, Mr. Benny,” Leibell remarked, “as you stood on that platform at Cannes that this would be the end of the play.”
Judge Leibell said the case was “exceptional because of the prominence and wealth” of the defendant but that he felt it was necessary to pass a sentence that would stand as a “lesson to you and to others who attain great prominence that you should be constantly on your guard against people who want to ‘do you a favor.’”
“The Government,” Leibell added, “must take steps to let everybody know that nobody, however prominent they are”, can do these things.
Denies Intent to Defraud
“This defendant is going to pay a heavy fine and is going to realize that he violated the law. I don’t think, however, that anything would be gained by sending him to jail.”
After sentence was pronounced, Benny stood stock still until his attorneys took him by the arm and led him out of the courtroom.
After the 30-minute hearing was over. Benny, through his attorneys, issued a statement in which he said that he had “no intention of defrauding the Government.” In committing what he called “a technical violation” of the law, Benny said, he had believed that what he did was “perfectly legitimate.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Wait til you see The New Pearl Orchid

The Start of Something Great!It is being photographed as we speak.

These rare aubergine Keshi pearls were sitting on my workbench, begging to be fashioned into something spectacular. It took a few days of playing around to figure out what they wanted to be: a fabulous orchid with a diamond embedded throat. The specks pollen were created by creating tiny balls of 18k gold.

Here’s the raw materials. I couldn’t believe how cool the new piece is.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pearl Blossom Necklace

Pearl Blossom Necklace

As seen in the windows at Gump’s in San Francisco.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Diamond at heart of royal upheavals up for sale

(Reuters) – A diamond coveted by kings, queens and princes for centuries, used to reinforce alliances between nations and pawned to pay off royal debts goes on sale at Sotheby’s in Geneva on May 15.

The auction house called the “Beau Sancy” “one of the most important historic diamonds ever to come to auction”, reflecting its part in the fluctuating fortunes of Europe’s royal families for more than 400 years.

The stone, a 35-carat modified “pear double rose cut” diamond belonging to Georg Friedrich, Prince of Prussia and head of the former ruling dynasty of the German empire, is expected to fetch $2-4 million.

“It’s a stone that appeals to me greatly as a survivor of all those tumultuous events,” said David Bennett, chairman of Sotheby’s jewellery in Europe and the Middle East.

“Stones from royal collections hardly ever appear at auction. In my career this is an absolute one-off,” he told Reuters by telephone from New York.

Bennett, who sold a pink diamond for $46.2 million in 2010 which was a record for any jewel at auction, said estimating the value of a stone like the Beau Sancy was difficult given its rarity.

The diamond originated from the mines in India near Golconda and was acquired by Nicolas de Harlay, Lord of Sancy, in Constantinople in the 1500s, explaining its name.

In 1604 it was bought for 75,000 livres by French king Henry IV as a gift for his wife, Marie de Medici.

JEALOUS QUEEN?

According to Sotheby’s, the queen had long coveted the stone, especially after learning that de Harlay had sold a larger diamond called the Sancy and now part of the Louvre Collection to King James I of England.

Henry IV was assassinated in 1610, and after years of rivalry between Marie and her son King Louis XIII, she was eventually exiled in disgrace.

She escaped to the Netherlands, and to settle her debts her possessions were sold, including the Beau Sancy which was acquired by Prince Frederick Henry of Orange-Nassau for 80,000 florins, the largest expenditure in the state budget of 1641.

In the same year, the diamond was used as a sweetener to help seal the wedding of Frederick’s son William to Mary Stuart, daughter of King Charles I of England.

Following Mary’s death in 1660, the Beau Sancy was pawned to settle her debts, but in 1677 the stone re-entered the Treasure of the House of Orange-Nassau following the wedding of William III to Mary II Stuart.

The couple ascended the throne of England in 1689, meaning the Beau Sancy entered the collection of the Queen of England, but since the couple had no children, the diamond returned to the Netherlands.

From there it moved to the Prussian monarchy in 1702, becoming the principal ornament of the new royal crown of Prussia, but its dramatic story did not end there.

The diamond remained in Berlin after the last king of Prussia fled to exile in November, 1918 at the end of World War One, and at the end of World War Two it was transferred to a bricked-up crypt for safe-keeping.

British troops found the stone and returned it to the estate of House of Prussia, where it has remained ever since.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Style Icon – Marlene Dietrich

In many of her movies, Marlene Dietrich wore her own suite of dramatic jewelry which was set with huge cabochon emeralds. (All those emeralds were particularly perfect for her role as the jewel thief in “Desire” in 1938.) In “Stage Fright“, Dietrich tries to use her jewelry to blackmail Jane Wyman. She also wears her own ruby bracelet in that film: that bracelet recently sold at Sotheby’s for $990,000. Once when baking a cake at Katherine Cornell‘s house, Marlene thought she had lost her 37.41-carat cabochon emerald ring which she had removed in the kitchen. The house was turned upside down but the ring couldn’t be found. It was only during dessert that the ring was discovered by one of the dinner guests inside a piece of the cake!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Whitney Houston dresses, jewelry to be auctioned

Faux Pearl Earrings Worn By Whitney Houston in "The Bodyguard"Whitney Houston has been laid to rest as of this past weekend. Her legacy will continue to live on, however, as some of her most iconic belongings will be auctioned off. A Black Velvet Dress that belonged to Whitney Houston and a pair of Earrings she wore in The Bodyguard will be sold to the highest bidder next month. Celebrity auctioneer, Darren Julien acquired the singer’s possessions soon after her death on Feb 11th, and will include the items in the Hollywood legend’s auction which is going to take place on 31st March and 1st April.

Pearl drop earrings used by the star in the 1992 hit movie are expected to fetch between $600 and $800, while a floral vest she wore is estimated to sell for up to $800, Julien’s Auctions said. Though these are the initial valuations, the price is likely to go higher once the bidding starts. A floor-length velvet gown and accessories from Houston’s appearances in other films and concerts will also be in next month’s auction, which is part of Julien’s Hollywood Legends sale.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Taylor Swift – Eliza Doolittle meets HeeHaw.

Taylor Swift looking amazing

Poor Taylor Swift.

Her designers must either love her or hate her. She was absolutely stunning at this past Sunday’s Grammy’s.

Look how she radiates in the golden glittering cheongsam-inspired gown. The high neck cut and caplet sleeves, the sequined train, the perfect gold earrings — she looks like Eliza Doolittle about to take to the dance floor with Professor Higgens.

Poor Taylor! What fresh hell is this?!

Alas, as if midnight struck and Cinderella’s ballgown had turned to rags, Taylor changed her outfit to perform. Even Ms. Swift’s natural beauty can’t make up for the fact that the vintage floral dress with peekaboo petticoat made her look like a cast extra from HeeHaw. Our precious belle-of-the-ball transformed back into Eliza the flower girl. I understand that she was trying to emulate a bluegrass band look, but I think I would have rather had her start the evening in this frock and then have her evolve to a rags-to-riches look.

However you slice it, she is an amazing young talent. I am hoping to see her bring a sense of glamor to music that seems to be missing these days.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment